Match info
| Date | League | Winner | Loser | Score | Type | |||||
| 2003-05-12 | STA Gold | Rabid | Rabid | 105.58 +6.01 |
rAh | Royal Assassins | 94.24 -6.01 |
250-60 90-180 | Torch2 Torch2 |
|
Writeup:
Rabid over rAh
GG we'd like to apologize for our o vs o and potshots (but only 1 offense player was doing it). We were in protest of sta from last week them ruling 3 defense w/ 6 offense and 3 of them potshotters was legit.
Our next match up shall be a little nicer :) It's out of our system now
GG fun to play some european peoples
Comments
|
|
|
BlindSide
12.225.105.14 |
Wow, nothing like taking advantage of a bunch of laggy euro's & not even having the nuts to atleast potshot them face to face..waiting till they go by and turning around to DM ?? You're fucking lame Rabid, I should say the next time you should continue with that idea on offense because we will bring the same.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
kevin
68.224.51.94 |
it was nothing personal, and 1 O player potshotted. we disagreed with how sta lets clans play the match, so we protest in repeating the same. he was our 6th d player, doing offense runs.
and dont bring up that its my fault euro's are laggy. they are ten thousand miles away or whatever. do you expect much better?
this is our first time we ever potshot intentionally. ask anyone we've played. we just kinda pissed at sta at the moment
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
dexterity
24.147.200.207 |
ahaha dispute :O
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
kevin
68.224.51.94 |
what's to dispute?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Krillin
65.24.246.213 |
You know, its a loophole in STA, we protested it during this match so maybe they can get rid of that shit on torch2
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Terf
65.25.137.149 |
Lets sum it all up in one post shall we?
Our last match was with NCA, our offense spent 60 minutes undergoing massive potshotting from 3 yard defenders. And after all of it didn't return one shot because we like to play a clean game. Then we are told that it is a completely legitimate and to read the rules next time. I can only hold them back so much, within the first 30 seconds Beast said your offense was potshotting, and you set off the trigger as he began to play as a 6 defense in the yard, which I might remind you is completely legal. Whenever your offense fired up into the battlements our soldier jumped down to fight you in the yard.
Lets just say that after we got screwed by a lame strategy, we were not about to let someone screw us again. Sorry if you thought it was lame, but if I remember correctly every time I made an o run, I was attacked at least twice in the yard. So I believe you have no grounds to complain, as you were playing the same way.
Just remember you started it, we just took it to the next level after getting screwed last week. Like Kev said, this is the first time we have ever potshot intentionally, but I'll be damned if I force the offense to play an entire match again without returning them. Sorry about the match, but were tired of playing clean when nobody else is. GG to you, and I can't wait for a return to normal CTF.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Fogdor
208.151.246.152 |
Look what the uber-llama Solo started!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
cala
64.9.156.113 |
lol euro talk
|
| |
|
