Deprecated: The behavior of unparenthesized expressions containing both '.' and '+'/'-' will change in PHP 8: '+'/'-' will take a higher precedence in /home/konspir/public_html/forums/includes/class_core.php on line 3502
Konspiracy.org

Match info

Date League Winner Loser Score Type
2003-08-11 STA Copper C4 Combo #4 102.94 
 +2.94
TSA Total Strategic Annihilation 74.80 
 -2.94
195-5 ss_nyx_l
Regular

Writeup:

C4 over TSA

Warmage got on IRC between roumds and said they forfeited the second round



Comments

Old
[]C4[]Omega61
12.238.94.244
GG Guys, sorry you had to bail on the 2nd round.
 
Old
{TSA} Gen. WarMage_Magus
67.164.142.76
Yeah, playing with 6 people against 9 isn't very fun... We came into tonight with a really good chance, trust me. If we wouldn't have forfeited, the score would have been much much worse. We had another person in a thunderstorm... OMG. We've got some cuts to go through and some major changes to do. I can't believe we only had 6 people there... what a total joke. This'll never happen again, and I plan to win next week for sure.
 
Old
[]C4[]Omega61
12.238.94.244
Sorry you only had 8 in the match, but there will always be next week, hope things are better for ya next time!
 
Old
{TS}A Gen. WarMage_Magus
67.164.142.76
We had 8 for about 5 minutes. Then it dropped down to 7 for nearly the whole reast of the round, when another guy went AFK. It was really more like 7. But still, even 1 man can make the biggest of differences, especially if 2 of the ppl who didnt show were your engy's. Thanks for waiting for us as well since we didnt have enough after game time. Good luck to you guys, it seems you have a bright future!
 
Old
[]C4[]Omega61
12.238.94.244
Thanks!! Hey, it was np to wait the extra time, we wanted to play a match not win by forfieit. Hope you are able to get everything sorted out for next week! Gl
 


Add a comment

Comment:

You must be logged in to post comments.

Konspiracy v4.0 - Code, images and content © 1999-2005 by Konspiracy.org. All rights reserved. Terms of use [ 0.0279ms ]
top of page